Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/2/21 14:47, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
[...]

Now, while we are at it, I also note that sometimes there are extremely offensive terms in my culture that are being commonly used in this discussion. The main example is "race"; in Italy, in Germany(*) and in other European cultures, using the term "race" to refer to a subset of mankind, implying that more than one "human race" exists, or suggesting that there are "race issues" and "race diversities" to be considered, is considered outright racism. I was shocked the first time I saw the term used as a category, but then I realized that there was no intention to offend - just a different linguistic background - and I moved on.

But if the principle is that nobody's sensitivity has to be offended, I think that we should definitely stop using the term "race" in this conversation or anywhere at the IETF.

As noted, it seems to me that a lot of the discussion around language is how a specific group feels about a specific set of words, because of their own historical background...where the rest needs to learn about those cultural issues and adapt accordingly (probably without the same policy necessarily applying the other way around).


I should also note that, if people are also concerned about historical background of words, I'm sure they should also be concerned about anything that contains a national symbol/flag or religious symbol (*).
And in that light, there should also be a recommendation in that respect.


(*) e.g., a simple rosary would be deemed as completely harmless in my place (I do wear one, although it's not visible), but it may certainly come across quite differently to e.g. people in some parts of Bosnia or Belfast (for obvious reasons... which I do understand... and which you don't need to go back a long time in history to understand).


Inclusiveness and diversity seem to be way more complex than what some seem to imply, and it implies a lot more than cherry-picking on specific items that would make a group look "nice and following the trend".

Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux