On 1/10/21 12:15 PM, Phillip
Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:22 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/8/21 12:31 PM, Kyle Rose wrote:
Staying on the same thread (so those who've muted can retain their sanity), but resetting a bit...
Instead of welcoming new ideas and new ways of working into the milieu, and expressing appreciation that others want to put in effort to contribute to this shared venture, you and others are suggesting we micromanage the terms of engagement.You say "new" as if it were inherently a Good Thing. It's not.
New is inherently a Good Thing.
Disagree. New tools and technology are not always better than old, even if the cost of retraining is ignored. Generally the marketplace sorts those things out, which might explain some of the bias, but this does not happen in every sphere.
This isn't a statement about what you're developing of course,
since I have no visibility into it.
Keith
