On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:29 AM Willem Toorop <willem@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 02-12-2020 om 23:31 schreef Stephen Farrell:
<snip>
> FWIW, I'd say it's worth a few more words to try reduce
> the probability of such failures happening, e.g. maybe
> just highlighting the "unsigned/2106" point you made
> above would be enough. But, if the WG don't want to do
> that, that's also fine by me.
Sure, NP. I'll include Brian Dicksen's provided clarification in the
text. Also, I approached Jean-Philippe Aumasson and he fixed the url we
used in the draft for SipHash, but recommends to use this one in the future:
https://www.aumasson.jp/siphash/
It seems like kind of a problem to have a normative algorithm reference to a random personal Website.
-Ekr
So I'll change that too.
Cheers,
-- Willem
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
