Re: Finger to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Wednesday, December 2, 2020 16:12 -0500 Keith Moore
<moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> p.s. RFC 2026 defines Historic as
> 
>     A specification that has been superseded by a more recent
>     specification or is for any other reason considered to be
> obsolete
> 
> I wonder if there's a need to be able to say "this
> specification is not obsolete in the sense that it has been
> entirely superseded or there's no longer any valid  use for
> it, but today and for the foreseeable future this
> specification seems only appropriate for use in specific
> niches, and not for general purpose use on the public
> Internet".

As soon as you say that, you are into Applicability Statement
territory, which, IMO, is really what this discussion should be
about.  See the telnet/ftp thread for details.

  john







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux