Hi Rich! > -----Original Message----- > From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 2:40 PM > To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: TLS access Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP > Service > > > FWIW, datatracker.ietf and www.ietf are the canonical repositories for the I- > Ds and RFCs in the IETF. > > Separate question: we were told for the newcomers slides to use rfc-editor.org > for official RFC references. How do we resolve that difference of views? I'm not knowledgeable enough to be the authority on this. I used "canonical" in a sloppy way to convey that the datatracker/www-ietf is authoratative when compared to tools.ietf. Roman
