Re: [109all] NOC update #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi John

> As this is quite a political question I will answer it for you.

> If the criticisms are narrowly interpreted as being about the front end we
> are running then this information implies that they were likely based on an
> incorrect interpretation of the issues.

I see. So when I attempted to switch browsers in order to work around an audio
problem and was informed that I could not rejoin the meeting because emailcore
had run over its time slot, even though the meeting was still going on, this
was simply a "misinterpretation of the issues" on my part?

And no doubt the problem with the calext meeting this morning was also purely
PIBKEC.

				Ned




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux