Re: [109all] NOC update #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 19 Nov 2020, at 12:52, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> Hi John
> 
>> As this is quite a political question I will answer it for you.
> 
>> If the criticisms are narrowly interpreted as being about the front end we
>> are running then this information implies that they were likely based on an
>> incorrect interpretation of the issues.
> 
> I see. So when I attempted to switch browsers in order to work around an audio
> problem and was informed that I could not rejoin the meeting because emailcore
> had run over its time slot, even though the meeting was still going on, this
> was simply a "misinterpretation of the issues" on my part?
> 
> And no doubt the problem with the calext meeting this morning was also purely
> PIBKEC.
> 
> 				Ned
> 

… and the loss of jabber this morning?

Stewart




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux