Rafa
Another separate thought. The references you have for algorithms are to
both IANA and RFC. It seems to me that the IANA pages will be more
up-to-date and can be updated by Expert Review which may take place
before there is an RFC available while the RFC provide more detail that
a user might want. I am uncertain which is best so I raised this on the
ipsecme WG list, which is responsible for IKEv2 maintenance, and I got
the following. The question is mine, the response from Tero Kivinen.
============================================================
> So, question. What references should draft i2nsf-sdn point readers to
> for up-to-date information on algorithms (assuming that they do not
> track the IETF WG that updates information on IKEv2 ie like me)?
It should use IANA registry for the mapping between numbers,
algorithms and references; and then for algoritm implementation
requirements and usage guidance it should point to RFC8247 for IKEv2,
and to RFC8221 for ESP.
> Currently that is both a reference to the IANA registry and to an RFC;
> is that your best advice?
Yes.
=============================================================
So do as you are currently doing and I shall stop thinking about it.
Tom Petch
On 28/10/2020 10:42, Rafa Marin-Lopez wrote:
Hi Tom:
<snip>
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
