| Hi Benjamin (and Tom)
Thanks for this discussion. We can wait for the proper reference.
We would like to mention we are also working in your review, and preparing the e-mail with our response. In this sense, thank you so much for your very detailed review. It is really valuable.
Best Regards. El 11 nov 2020, a las 6:36, Benjamin Kaduk < kaduk@xxxxxxx> escribió:
Hi Tom, Rafa,On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:37:47PM +0000, tom petch wrote:Rafa
My attempt to read the text keeps running into a brick wall (lockdown:-(
but I have a few new comments. I said sometime ago that the IESG would
likely find plenty to say and I see that Benjamin has lived up to my
expectations. I wish I could be as productive as him:-(
For completeness, I include what I have found so far but suspect that
they will all be overtaken by IESG comments.
RFC2247 I don't find good for DN; I find RFC4519 better but suspect that
X.520 would be better still but do not have a copy of that to hand; this
is the sort of thing I expect the IESG to have definite views on
I agree that 2247 is not very good for DN (but I missed that in my ownreview; thank you for noticing it!).I think that the best reference might differ if we want the conventionalstring encoding of the DN vs the actual ASN.1 structure, but I think Iwould have to consult with some other experts to be certain of the rightreference, in either case.-Ben_______________________________________________I2nsf mailing listI2nsf@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
------------------------------------------------------- Rafa Marin-Lopez, PhD Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC) Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia 30100 Murcia - Spain Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: rafa@xxxxx-------------------------------------------------------
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
