it's interesting reading the mail archives for this selected team:https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-arch/41Yg6lCrDMwz90P3qdv9BNN5FCQ/
"This is an important effort for the IETF community" - but it is not a community effort? How does the IETF run these days? Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
looking forward to the Center for Democracy and Technology resolving the US election and constitutional crisis. Go, team!
On 4 Nov 2020, at 07:28, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/3/20 3:07 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:To me, IETF is best when it is driven by engagement of contributors,
and (rough) community consensus, and not by leadership decisions.
Unfortunately, i think we are shifting more and more to this leadership
preference based constrainment of innitiatives, innovation and activities,
spending more time on prohibiting activities than encouraging them.
This is IMHO, what is going to kill IETF if it continues.
+1.The proper role of the leadership is to facilitate community consensus, but I keep seeing examples of leadership trying to dictate outcomes.Keith
|
