> On 2020-08-17, at 20:58, Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://www.ietf.org/status-report/ietf-progress-report.html Thank you! 2019-08-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1778" 2019-09-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1776" 2019-10-subcounts.csv:"ietf","3887" 2019-11-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1777" 2019-12-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1774" 2020-01-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1855" 2020-02-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1788" 2020-03-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1791" 2020-04-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1794" 2020-05-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1790" 2020-06-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1797" 2020-07-subcounts.csv:"ietf",”1799” I’m not sure where the 3887 came from, and whether the smaller 1855 spike also was an artifact. I also don’t know if this is counting private subscribers the same way mailman does. Assuming that it doesn’t, and that these are end-of-month figures, we would have had ~ 1830 total at the start of August, 1820 about 10 days later (I’m not sure that really was Aug 13), and 1780 now. That would be 2.5 % loss over the recent logorrhea. Grüße, Carsten PS.: 2019-10-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1724" 2019-11-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1629" 2019-12-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1596" 2020-01-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1569" 2020-02-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1559" 2020-03-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1548" 2020-04-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1538" 2020-05-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1522" 2020-06-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1512" 2020-07-subcounts.csv:"last-call",”1504" Hmm. Color me surprised.
