Re: Terminology discussion threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/13/2020 3:48 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
At least there seems to be sufficient +1 from distinguished community
members such as current or past IAB, IESG members, IAB Liaison, IETF ISOC
appointee, IRTF and NomCom chair to hope that the action taken was rightfully
within the privilege of IETF chair according to the rules.

Mike StJohns, Past IAB, Past Nomcom Chair
Scott Bradner, Past IAB, Past Area Director
Randy Bush, Past Area Director
Charlie Perkins,  Past IAB

(sorry if I've missed other roles...)

So what's your point?

In any event, my opinion is that this action was NOT taken "rightfully within the privilege of the IETF chair according to the rules", but I'm withholding further judgement until the Chair responds to my request to clarify which part of 3005 they believe applies and grants authority for a mass PR threat.


If this step was ultimately determined (by whom... ?) not to be within
the privilege of IETF chair then i am bit worried about what i would
have to think about all those +1.

I'm not sure why.  Everyone has opinions.  Some are more useful than others, and each of us will have an opinion on that topic as well.


Later, Mike







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux