Re: Terminology discussion threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At least there seems to be sufficient +1 from distinguished community
members such as current or past IAB, IESG members, IAB Liaison, IETF ISOC
appointee, IRTF and NomCom chair to hope that the action taken was rightfully
within the privilege of IETF chair according to the rules.

If this step was ultimately determined (by whom... ?) not to be within
the privilege of IETF chair then i am bit worried about what i would
have to think about all those +1.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 04:17:29PM -0300, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
> 
> There may have been more ???+1???s, but declaring consensus on this issue
> would be??? adventurous??? to put it mildly.
> 
> /Carlos
> 
> On 13 Aug 2020, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> 
> > Randy: There seems to be more than rough consensus from many IETF
> > leadership
> > representatives that this is the right course of action from the number
> > of
> > +1 reactions to this thread.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux