If we can put the most important new standards into RFC abbreviation list even after i tell an AD twice, then i don't think we can deal with new technical terms in the organization any better. On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:34:43PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2020-07-25, at 23:04, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > For exmple i have to observe a real bad execution on evolving the > > RFC abbreviations list, and every time i pointed to problems, > > they where not fixed, and ADs did not bother to pick up the problem. > > True. One of these ???medium importance??? issues??? Hard to get attention for them. > > I think we need a calendar to attend to them once a year or so. > > Grüße, Carsten
