Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carrick Bartle <cbartle891@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:08:44 +0000
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e7956fd8-2639-3df6-9539-0dd483cafa25@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
References: <933ce8b4-78a5-76bf-55c3-7c5694faffbb@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <267BCA35-3A3F-440B-9F5F-2C818D5AE71A@icloud.com> <e7956fd8-2639-3df6-9539-0dd483cafa25@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401

>    That is, we have long established agreement to use words
    to be considered bad by many for technical terms.

So why not use other words that many do not consider bad or hurtful?

References:
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Masataka Ohta
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Carrick Bartle
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Masataka Ohta

Prev by Date: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Next by Date: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Previous by thread: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Next by thread: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux