Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think we can all agree that slavery is bad, right? So why should we even allude to it in technical documents?




> 
> On Jul 23, 2020, at 11:09 PM, Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The IESG wrote:
> 
>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/
> 
> US centric view of the draft as if only blacks were slaves
> is totally wrong only to make people in other part of the
> world or with knowledge on world history upset or angry.
> 
> For example, Christianity was banned in medieval Japan
> because Christians exported many Japanese as slaves.
> 
> For another example, in ancient Greece, many white people
> were enslaved.
> 
> As "slave" has long established meaning having nothing
> to do especially with blacks in recent (that is, for
> these 100 or 200 years) US, it is stupid to ban it.
> 
> Or, should we avoid talking on ancient Greece, because
> slavery was common?
> 
>                        Masataka Ohta
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux