Howdy,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 2:47 PM Ben Campbell <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please note Ted’s document[1] currently being discussed in (and is on the IETF108 agenda for) DISPATCH. This is probably not relevant to “What to do about this appeal” discussion, but probably is relevant to the “Registration of schemes is broken” discussion.
I don't think this is a reflection that the registration of schemes is broken; it's a reflection that the registration of URI.arpa zone entries is. That requires a scheme be registered in a category that's gone, and this short document fixes that and nothing else.
regards,
Ted
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update/Thanks,Ben.On Jul 17, 2020, at 11:27 PM, Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx> wrote:Maybe it's time to rethink the whole registry of schemes, because this one isn't working.
If the URL spec moves https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ then the scheme registry should go with it.
As long as IETF non-web applications can get the registrations they need.
Then Subject appeal would be THEIR headache.
Larry
--
https://LarryMasinter.net https://going-remote.info
