RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Russ

 

I make no comment on the content of the thread, but I think you need to look at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/Zm_spdzPvzlf7uXMdLKQ4xMSXlU/

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: 16 July 2020 17:25
To: Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme

 

Two of the point in the appeal talk about overriding a consensus, but from the appeal text, I cannot tell where the consensus was reached.  I suspect that there is context know to people that have been involved in this since April, bt that does not include me.  Can these pointers to the consensus call(s) be provided?

 

Russ

 

On Jul 16, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

The IESG has received an appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme and his related registration requests to IANA.  The appeal has been posted on the appeals page:

https://www..ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/

 

Additional information has been requested from both Tim and IANA.  Once those details have been received, the IESG will proceed to evaluate the appeal and render a decision.

 

Barry and Murray, ART Area Directors

For the IESG