Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/06/2020, at 7:23 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jay,

Where did IETF loose 137,559 in sponsoring between Madrid and Virtual ?

Our sponsorship contracts for in-person meetings are very specific to in-person meetings and so when we switch an in-person meeting to online those contracts are voided.  Some do not translate to an on online meeting as they are specific to a part of the meeting that is not replicated, while others are at a lower level to recognise the different nature of the meeting.

Jay


Cheers
   Toerless

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 09:34:35PM +1200, Jay Daley wrote:
Tim

On 11/06/2020, at 9:03 PM, Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I can see both points of view, but it would help to understand the rationale for the fee if there were some data published - and maybe I missed it - on the administrative cost of running a wholly online IETF meeting.  And whether that fee is covering purely those, or a share of the year on year administrative costs for the IETF.

Answers in this blog post

https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-registration-fees/

Jay
--
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director

--
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx

--
Ietf108planning mailing list
Ietf108planning@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning


-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux