On 09/06/2020 21:42, Jay Daley wrote: > I need to check, but I think the intent there was to restrict > livestreaming and nothing else as the combination of live streaming + > open jabber rooms would effectively allow participation without > registration. Is that a slippery slope I see before me? ;-( This is all getting a bit objectionable. If charging for remote attendees for IETF108 is not precedent setting, I see no need to start to build a defensive infrastructure (neither legal nor systems) around that emergency one-off decision. Especially not one that's entirely at odds with the IETF's tradition and goal of openness. I'm now considering whether or not to register TBH. S.
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
