> On Jun 3, 2020, at 2:51 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:30 PM George Michaelson <ggm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> My only concern is that the ESTA/CBP barriers to entry for IETF >> participants who have travel issues to the USA remain. We are in >> effect normalising US foreign policy discrimination against IETF >> participation F2F > > It seems that putting a meeting back in the US is really not something > the IETF should do... not until the current problems (virus, <internal > strife>, external restrictions> are fixed... I don't think we(ietf) > should be concerned about the potential loss on the SF site > deposits/etc... easy for someone who would not pay the fee to say - it seems rather sensible to me to reschedule the US meeting that the IETF would have to pay rather big money to cancel at least to keep the options open - it can be canceled (and the fee paid) some time in the future if need be (likely depending on the outcome of the upcoming elections) Scott
