Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:26:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <0482BAB9-FA5A-4341-BBFB-EBF1578A36EF@chopps.org>
References: <CALaySJLEYak1dYJazaN1QSvjTzW3o-nSCA6XOuTP=sZ+yyzhMA@mail.gmail.com> <b84682f7-2bec-6639-6ccb-b9a8af52edfe@network-heretics.com> <0482BAB9-FA5A-4341-BBFB-EBF1578A36EF@chopps.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 4/30/20 1:20 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:

Area metadata as a way to filter seems useful to me as well (the draft name usually has the WG in it).


Yes, but explicit metadata would be better than heuristics.

Also, of course, some Last Calls aren't for WG documents, and it wouldbe nice to be able to classify those also.


Keith

References:
- Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
  - From: Barry Leiba
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
  - From: Christian Hopps

Prev by Date: Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
Next by Date: Re: Protecting Copyright.
Previous by thread: Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
Next by thread: Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux