Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Apr 30, 2020, at 1:08 PM, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I have mixed feelings about this.
> 
> I am all for having a way to reduce the amount of email that I received and that I don't care about, and the vast majority of Last Calls that IETF has these days are not things I am likely to want to dig into.   But separating the Last Call list from the IETF list doesn't really help that.   What I'd like is a way to subscribe to Last Calls in specific areas or working groups.   Or if the announcements had a bit of extra metadata attached to the messages, e.g. working group name and area, I could use SIEVE to show me only the last call announcements that I care about.   Then having a separate last call list would become beneficial at least for those who could use SIEVE (admittedly, and sadly, probably a small fraction of IETF).

Area metadata as a way to filter seems useful to me as well (the draft name usually has the WG in it).

Thanks,
Chris.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux