Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(Don't have an answer, but a question or three)

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:34 AM Michael Thomas <mike@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/20 7:28 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I just noticed that Zoom claims to use SIP poking around. The question is not whether it's SIP per se, but whether there will be inter-carrier anything. If there is inter-carrier, then the problem will remain, especially when it traverses an intermediary proxy.
>
>
> Zoom interoperate with SIP, I think. But they used to interop via XMPP as well, and I believe they use XMPP internally. They stopped external interop with XMPP when Google and Facebook ceased to use it, I think.
>
> Ok, that probably what I was seeing. I wasn't actually setting out to see if they used SIP :)

So, if you setup a service (zoom, for your example here) and you
'guarantee' to your users that the path is encrypted (for instance),
and you enable federation in the XMPP sense, how do you keep your
guarantee?

repeat with gtalk or facebook-chat or aol-instant-messenger...

For the shaken/stir conversation what's the actual problem trying to be solved?
I thought; "Did the person I see calling me actually make this call?"
or perhaps: "Is the identity I see really the identity that initiated
the call?"





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux