Hi Tim, > > How about starting with the IPng archives?! They're actually more > > persistant than, say, an internet draft, anyway. > > No need to bother, just read any sample of 100 ipng emails in one day and > the same arguments come up again and again. And again. Just to second this - and its a process guestion (wait, there is another working group focused on that ...) - I thought that, at the end of the day, we are supposed to be making standards, not mailing list archives .... John