NO - I do not agree with Keith's assertion as quoted.
YES - I agree with what I *believe* Keith wanted to say, which is that "introduction of *site-scoped* addresses causes far more problems than it solves".
I do NOT believe that introduction of link-local addresses causes far more problems than it solves.
My position on SL should be well known. I'll try to avoid repeating the rest of my arguments once again in this discussion tree.
Harald
--On fredag, april 18, 2003 15:12:54 -0700 Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net> wrote:
Keith Moore wrote:It doesn't solve all problems, but introduction of scoped addresses causes far more problems than it solves.
I would like to understand how many people that voted YES on the question of deprecating SL concur with Keith's assertion.
Tony
Note: I cc'd the IETF list to catch those who may have been in the room in SF, but aren't on the IPv6 list.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com --------------------------------------------------------------------