Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John,

JM>    Although it may seem silly to
JM> some (and some of you may not want to hear from them anyway), the 
JM> IETF's formatting rules do present a (relatively small) hurdle to 
JM> public policy advocates and other outsiders.

well, this is an unexpected benefit of our formatting rules...

the IETF is a technical body, not a place for public policy debates.

and to the extent you want to pursue the matter seriously, there are
at least two critical items to remembers:

1.  The format requirements are easy to satisfy, with support for MS
Word and XML-based documents readily available;

2.  Technical standards bodies typically have some sort of format
standard. Within my limited experience, the IETF requirements are
easily the easiest.

d/
JM> I personally think that there is value in allowing those less


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]