Scott, > I think that thinking that a WG chair did not properly > judge consensus is reasonable grounds for an appeal. In "did not properly judge consensus", do you include "did not properly formulate the text of the consensus"? Michel.
Scott, > I think that thinking that a WG chair did not properly > judge consensus is reasonable grounds for an appeal. In "did not properly judge consensus", do you include "did not properly formulate the text of the consensus"? Michel.