RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@ietf.org, michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us, sob@harvard.edu
Subject: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F5045724@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

> Consensus on removing part of a published spec not being specific.

I think that thinking that a WG chair did not properly judge consensus
is reasonable grounds for an appeal

Scott

References:
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Next by Date: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Previous by thread: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Next by thread: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]