RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@ietf.org, michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us, sob@harvard.edu
Subject: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:34:40 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F504F776@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

> In "did not properly judge consensus", do you include "did not properly
> formulate the text of the consensus"?

I would think so

(but that is my own opinion)

Scott

References:
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: NOSHADE CLASS
Next by Date: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Previous by thread: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Next by thread: RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]