Joe Baptista wrote: >Incidentally >rfc 1918 is irrelevant to it - those are internal border addresses - non >public "Address Allocation for Private Internets". Unless I'm missing >something it's the public address network. > Vladis's point was that using addresses not assigned to you on the public network was like using RFC-1918 addresses on the public network. -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke |jstracke@centivinc.com | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com | |Centiv |My opinions are my own. | |==============================================================| |"Where's your sense of adventure?" "In front of a roaring fire| |with a cup of cocoa." | \==============================================================/
