Re: Why Spam is a problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com> writes:
> Somewhat more to the point, the DMA is very pragmatic.  If they
> see the writing on the wall for "plain spam", they will almost
> certainly rapidly start to retreat toward "responsible spam",
> including opt-out systems, unenforceable laws, etc., with the
> claim that they are trying to find a good balance between the
> "needs" or marketers and consumer desires.

It won't matter. If the laws aren't effective, the torch wielding mobs
won't go away. In the end, the DMA will either accept laws that work,
or they'll ultimately lose. I suspect the latter.


Perry


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]