Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore wrote:

>in many (not all) cases it's fairly safe to assume that a message from 
>an unreplyable address is not of interest to a recipient. 
>  
>
Definitely not all.  Counterexample: when Amazon sends out order 
confirmation messages, they say that the From: address will not accept 
mail.  (Personally, I think this is a bad thing, customer-service-wise, 
but that's another question.)

-- 
/===========================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke@centivinc.com  |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com|
|Centiv            |My opinions are my own. |
|===========================================|
|Know your limits, then destroy 'em.        |
\===========================================/




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]