Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




on 8/15/2002 12:32 AM Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Keith Moore wrote:

>>this is already possible.  it is not sufficient.
> 
> It's possible but it's useless as one can't depend on it: too many MTA's 
> are configured to refuse EXPN/VRFY requests if they were implemented in 
> the first place.

And in the case of a spammer with his own domain, what's to stop him from
responding in the positive to everything? Useless.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]