Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegationmechanism, Re: Trees have one root)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 3:31 PM -0400 8/2/02, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
[snip]...[snip]... [snip]...[snip]... [snip]...[snip]... [snip]...[snip]...


>It's never been "shown" to my knowledge.  Keep in mind that a large part of
>the user community thinks the root is called .AOL
>
>That's who *REALLY* controls '.'.  I doubt any of them qualify as 
>"Joe Clueless"

No Way does the world think that .AOL is the root.

Maybe they think that .AOL.COM is the only useful domain name, but 
even AOL was too dumb to figure out that getting .AOL would solve a 
lot of the problems they have trying to round up the likes of AOL.BR, 
and such.

There is nothing wrong with .AOL and .IBM and .MSN solving their DNS 
registry problems by getting TLDs for themselves, as compared with 
warping ICANN into a protection device for the Intellectual 
Properties that use their trademarks.
but, AOL is missing lots of things so none of this is even slightly odd.

Cheers...\Stef


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]