On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Michael Welzl wrote:
All of what you wrote below is ok with me; so this is where
I step back and see what happens, and then go with what
you and the chairs decide...
My view of the discussion so far from last fall and now is, that
there isn't clear support to make this DCCP item. There has been
some pushback against adopting this to DCCP, but doing the work in
ICCRG instead, and while the other comments say this might be safe
congestion-control wise, with pointing out some technical concerns,
I haven't seen anyone (apart from the authors) clearly pushing to
adopt this as a DCCP item. Do you think this is a fair summary?
Yes.
Regarding the CCID part you mentioned, in think this would be an
excellent opportunity to test the experimental DCCP CCIDs. I'm not
sure if the guidelines and processes of using these CCIDs are
clearly enough specified. Maybe this is something to be addressed in
the user guide, which is still an open DCCP WG document we should
finish (or declare it canceled).
Ok. Sounds all good to me.
Cheers,
Michael
