Hi, Michael asked on the ICCRG list for people to comment whether MulTFRC should be a WG item here. My personal (all hats off) belief is that DCCP should focus on work items that increase DCCP and TFRC deployment. Frankly, I don't think that "porting" an old and unused idea (MulTCP) to TFRC is going to lead to that. I'm not opposed to the WG taking this on is they absolutely want. I mainly don't see a reason for this to be a DCCP WG Experimental RFC vs. an ICCRG Experimental RFC. Lars
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
