Hi gorry,
On 20 Mar 2008, at 13:45, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
I've updated the SC draft in-line with the various inputs. Since
there were many comments - and some of these conflicted, I have
made an interim version at:
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/dccp/SC/
Please do look and see if this version corrects the issues, and
tell me of any remaining or new issues.
A couple of minor issues:
- Section 1.1, top of page 6, grammar: "No protocols issues arise
from a port being associated with two Service Codes, each bound to
different applications does not raise any protocol issues."
- Section 3.3.1, second bullet point: rather than MUST reject the
connection with reason "Bad Service Code", it may be appropriate to
suggest that servers SHOULD reject the connection with reason "Bad
Service Code", but MAY use the reason "Connection Refused". Requiring
a Bad Service Code response allows an information leak - something is
listening on the port - which some servers may wish to avoid.
Cheers,
--
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/
