Re: udev fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:15:43PM +0000, sickmind@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On 11:05 Wed 12 Sep     , Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:52PM +0000, sickmind@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I know that many people do not like the way udev development went
>> > > recently,
>> >
>> > What specifically are you objecting to?
>>
>> Extra dependencies and L. Poettering's position that running udev
>> without systemd is a dead end and will not be supported in the future
>> (this seem to be already discussed here before).
>
> What dependencies?  Run time?  Build time?  And why are dependencies
> bad?  Do you have no ram in your system for them?
>
> Personally, I think running a Linux system without systemd is a deadend,
> but hey, what do I know about these things?  :)
>
>> > > therefore we have a systemd-free fork of udev.
>> >
>> > udev works without systemd running on the system just fine for me,
>> > doesn't it for you?
>>
>> Call me paranoid, but I'm afraid that won't last long.
>
> Fear as a development motivator?  That's odd, really?

brain damaged?

Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux