On 11:05 Wed 12 Sep , Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:52PM +0000, sickmind@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know that many people do not like the way udev development went > > recently, > > What specifically are you objecting to? Extra dependencies and L. Poettering's position that running udev without systemd is a dead end and will not be supported in the future (this seem to be already discussed here before). > > therefore we have a systemd-free fork of udev. > > udev works without systemd running on the system just fine for me, > doesn't it for you? Call me paranoid, but I'm afraid that won't last long. > > At the moment most of the changes (except for systemd integration) > > have been ported, and no stability issues are noticed. I hope it will > > be useful for those who don't like systemd being pushed in their > > systems. > > > > P.S. This maillist seems to be dead for quite a while and most of the > > discussion moved to systemd-related lists, so I hope nobody would mind > > if we use it as our primary maillist. > > Who is "we"? > > And note, if you are forking udev (which is fine by me, no objections), > be careful with the release numbers and naming, to keep others from > getting confused. Me, a bunch of other guys commiting code, and possible users. Thanks for the advice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
