Re: udev 130 minor incongruity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:15, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:27 PM, David Zeuthen <david@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> You mean we should introduce a: --slibdir=/lib option, instead of
>>>> using --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=""?
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think so. Wouldn't it be more logical?
>>
>> He, the --exec-prefix="" thing works fine for udev, because it has no
>> binaries in /usr. :) That's not a generally useful approach for
>> others.
>>
>>> I guess, what I'm saying
>>> is that it would be useful if no options was needed for configure for
>>> the default use (building packages and hacking on an udev version that
>>> overwrites package supplied files).
>>
>> That we could do today already with setting the defaults to
>> --prefix=/usr and --exec-prefix=.
>
> Just in case you're wondering how to detect this:
>
> AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT([/usr])
> test "$prefix" = NONE && test "$exec_prefix" = NONE && exec_prefix=
>
> Then if I said, --prefix=/just/testing, $exec_prefix will follow like
> it normally would.

Sounds good. I added that.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux