Re: udev 130 minor incongruity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:27 PM, David Zeuthen <david@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> You mean we should introduce a: --slibdir=/lib option, instead of
>>> using --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=""?
>>
>> Yeah, I think so. Wouldn't it be more logical?
>
> He, the --exec-prefix="" thing works fine for udev, because it has no
> binaries in /usr. :) That's not a generally useful approach for
> others.
>
>> I guess, what I'm saying
>> is that it would be useful if no options was needed for configure for
>> the default use (building packages and hacking on an udev version that
>> overwrites package supplied files).
>
> That we could do today already with setting the defaults to
> --prefix=/usr and --exec-prefix=.

Just in case you're wondering how to detect this:

AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT([/usr])
test "$prefix" = NONE && test "$exec_prefix" = NONE && exec_prefix=

Then if I said, --prefix=/just/testing, $exec_prefix will follow like
it normally would.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux