On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:48 +0000, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Yes, I've looked at that. The script Mark had written appears to do the > checking that's indicated for test case 2, so I was wondering if this > comment in the minutes meant that more checks were needed beyond those? > I've added some PASS/FAIL statements to the checks, and could add more > if there are other things I should be checking. I don't think we need more PASS/FAIL checks in the scripts. I think we need to add different background workloads to try to trigger a problem that we didn't see with an idle system as the background. > > Thanks, > Bryce > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > > > > Did you get a chance to look at the test cases document that Mark wrote > > up? there's a link to it off the hotplug SIG page, I think it's called > > CPU test plan or something like that. > > Martine > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bryce Harrington [mailto:bryce@xxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:00 AM > > To: Silbermann, Martine > > Cc: hotplug_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Hotplug_sig] MINUTES for Hotplug SIG Con Call 03/26 > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:47:24PM -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > > > > > > Summary list of ARs from this meeting: > > > > > > AR for Mark and Bryce: Transfer project info w/ supporting > > > tests/scripts/docs. > > > > > > AR for Bryce (after he's caught up :-) upgrade the CPU test scripts to > > > > > include more checking and write a "stress test" wrapper script > > > > Are there some details on what additional checking is required beyond > > what's in the scripts currently? > > > > Thanks, > > Bryce > _______________________________________________ > Hotplug_sig mailing list > Hotplug_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/hotplug_sig -- Mary Edie Meredith maryedie@xxxxxxxx 503-906-1942 Data Center Linux Initiative Manager Open Source Development Labs
