Yes, I've looked at that. The script Mark had written appears to do the checking that's indicated for test case 2, so I was wondering if this comment in the minutes meant that more checks were needed beyond those? I've added some PASS/FAIL statements to the checks, and could add more if there are other things I should be checking. Thanks, Bryce On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > > Did you get a chance to look at the test cases document that Mark wrote > up? there's a link to it off the hotplug SIG page, I think it's called > CPU test plan or something like that. > Martine > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryce Harrington [mailto:bryce@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:00 AM > To: Silbermann, Martine > Cc: hotplug_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Hotplug_sig] MINUTES for Hotplug SIG Con Call 03/26 > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:47:24PM -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > > > > Summary list of ARs from this meeting: > > > > AR for Mark and Bryce: Transfer project info w/ supporting > > tests/scripts/docs. > > > > AR for Bryce (after he's caught up :-) upgrade the CPU test scripts to > > > include more checking and write a "stress test" wrapper script > > Are there some details on what additional checking is required beyond > what's in the scripts currently? > > Thanks, > Bryce
