Also, I think we agreed that we need to add more background activity when we run the scripts - the database workload or maybe reaim, something that wont get confused with the cpus going off and on. On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 17:02 -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > Did you get a chance to look at the test cases document that Mark wrote > up? there's a link to it off the hotplug SIG page, I think it's called > CPU test plan or something like that. > Martine > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryce Harrington [mailto:bryce@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:00 AM > To: Silbermann, Martine > Cc: hotplug_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Hotplug_sig] MINUTES for Hotplug SIG Con Call 03/26 > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:47:24PM -0400, Silbermann, Martine wrote: > > > > Summary list of ARs from this meeting: > > > > AR for Mark and Bryce: Transfer project info w/ supporting > > tests/scripts/docs. > > > > AR for Bryce (after he's caught up :-) upgrade the CPU test scripts to > > > include more checking and write a "stress test" wrapper script > > Are there some details on what additional checking is required beyond > what's in the scripts currently? > > Thanks, > Bryce > > _______________________________________________ > Hotplug_sig mailing list > Hotplug_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/hotplug_sig -- Mary Edie Meredith maryedie@xxxxxxxx 503-906-1942 Data Center Linux Initiative Manager Open Source Development Labs
