RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: socket interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think dbus is pretty nice, but there are environments that won't run dbus. I'd propose that there would be one command/control interface and that the CLI would just be a client of that interface. If that's dbus, then fine, but something that didn't require another framework and just relied on libc would be better.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrej Shadura <andrew@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:30 PM
To: Teunis Peters <teunis.peters@xxxxxx>
Cc: Gladish, Jacob <Jacob_Gladish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: socket interface

Hi,

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 19:08, Teunis Peters <teunis.peters@xxxxxx> wrote:
> dbus has no business on embedded environments like AP it will not
> happen now, it may not ever happen.

This is not true, I’ve seen and developed embedded systems with D-Bus.

--
Cheers,
  Andrej
_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux