Thanks for the information Ian – but how do I control what gets populated in H.225 destinationAddress when responding to a RouteRequest message? Or is it a gatekeeper.ini setting? Marvin Herbold Principal Software Engineer Access Interpreting (571) 730-4330 (Voice) (571) 730-4331 (Fax) (866) 824-9238 (Video Phone) From: Ian Blenke [mailto:ian@xxxxxxxxxx] There are something like 4 different data elements that can be populated in H.225 destinationAddress: dialedDigits, ipAddress, h323uri, h323aliasId... If you only specify an H.225 destinationAddress that is the ipAddress of the phone, it accepts the call. If you happen to populate the dialedDigits, or h323aliasId, it had better be the 10 digit phone number of the VP200, or the VP200 will reject it immediately with a releaseComplete. If you populate the h323uri, I'm not sure what the VP200 would do, probably the same thing. Sorenson's videophone firmware is very quirky. First off, however, I'd follow Jan and Simon's suggestion and stop using Ekiga. It is useless. - Ian On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Marvin Herbold <mherbold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: That does actually seem like what it is doing… but then, how is Ekiga connecting? The only information I am giving Ekiga is the IP address of the Sorenson VP. Perhaps the Sorenson VP will also accept the public IP address that it is sitting on, as the H.225 destinationAddress? I will try it out… but my question now is how do I get GnuGK to send the correct H.225 destinationAddress in the setup message? Is this the “alias” parameter in the RouteToGatekeeper respons? Or? Thanks for all your help guys! Marvin Herbold From: Ian Blenke [mailto:ian@xxxxxxxxxx]
The Sorenson VP200 will reject a call to any phone number that it does not know itself as. By default, a VP200 knows itself as 2 different phone numbers: a "Local Number" and a "Direct VP" tollfree number. Simply put, make sure the H.225 destinationAddress in the SETUP message is a phone number the VP200 knows itself as. - Ian On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Marvin Herbold <mherbold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Yes, the endpoints are able to talk to each other without a gatekeeper in
From: Jan Willamowius [mailto:jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Hi, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________________ --
-- |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
_______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
