Hi Jan, So basically if I want to have the best of both worlds I should use two separate connections? One with "trace 0" for issuing commands and an other one with "trace max" for tracking events? Oh well... I guess I'll go with two connections for now. Thanks for the advice. :) Regards, Esa Jan Willamowius kirjoitti: > Hi Esa, > > unfortunately there is no such guarantee. The only thing you can count > on is the fact that a single line won't be interrupted. > But you can set the status port output level to turn off events that you > don't want to see; eg. after a "trace 0" you will only see responses to > your commands and reload notifications. > Or you can use status port filtering to limit the events that your > application sees. > > Regards, > Jan > > > Esa Nyrhinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm writing an application that uses the status port and I have a simple >> question about how the status port works. >> >> Does the gnugk guarantee that all responses that it writes to the status >> port that are multiple lines long like for example for commands like ! >> and ? are written without interruption so that I can trust that it will >> never insert for example an extra RRJ or something between the beginning >> and the end of the response for the ! command when I'm not filtering out >> anything? >> >> Best Regards, >> Esa > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
