You are right, but he must be twin everywhere. He is different in ARQ and Radius Accountig message. How to fix this problem? Plamen > I think it's already public IP. The problem is that auth modules > send private IPs - I think there should be RAS NAT address > sent instead. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Horne" <s.horne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 12:35 PM > > >> I agree it should really be the public IP. >> Michal do you want to change it? >> >> Simon >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openh323gk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:openh323gk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of >> Tusar >> Sent: Sunday, 21 October 2007 5:11 PM >> To: GNU Gatekeeper Users >> Subject: Re: Framed-IP-Address >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I would vote for the public address. >> >> Regards, >> >> ..Tusar.. >> >> >> >> On 10/21/07, Zygmuntowicz Michal < m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> There have been long discussions about which IP address >> should be sent. Some people needed private IP addresses, >> som public ones. I would vote for the public address, but the most >> important thing is to have IP address usage consistent across all >> modules, so we use either priavte or public one in each module, >> not the mix of both. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Simon Horne" <s.horne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:31 PM >> >> >>> Plamen >>> >>> I think the new behaviour is correct (unless jan or michal correct me). >>> The >>> IP address as seen by the gatekeeper is the public IP 88.x.x.x and not >>> the >>> private 192.168.1.100 so the address for radius accounting should be >>> the >>> public IP. >>> >>> Is there a reason why this is causing a problem? >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: openh323gk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:openh323gk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]On Behalf Of >>> plamen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2007 3:38 AM >>> To: GNU Gatekeeper Users >>> Subject: Framed-IP-Address >>> >>> >>> Hi All >>> I try to test latest cvs version of GNUGK with PacPhone. >>> PacPhone working behind a NAT. PacPhone IP 192.168.1.100 ( NAT IP >>> 88.80.101.122) >>> >>>>From radius log: >>> >>> In RRQ >>> Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.1.100 >>> >>> In ARQ >>> Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.1.100 >>> >>> In Radius Accountig >>> Framed-IP-Address = 88.80.101.122 >>> >>> Why? In old version (cvs from Jun 2007) Framed-IP-Address is same for >>> RRQ, >>> ARQ and Radius Accounting. >>> >>> PWLIB-1.11.0 >>> H323-1.19.0 >>> >>> Best regards >>> PlayMen > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________________ > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Archive: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users > Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
