There's another problem in the child-parent scenario in 2.0.10 and in 2.2.3 too i guess (i didn't test it on 2.2.3). The problem has to do with the newly introduced feature "IRRCheck". Enabling this feature allows to detect calls that are not active anymore (i.e. because the endpoints have died without terminating the call). The gatekeeper listens to IRR messages that have to be sent in a predefined period (IRRFrequency) from both endpoints. If the gatekeeper does not receive such an IRR within the define period it assumes the call to have died and clears it from it's list of active calls. During this process DRQ messages are sent from the gatekeeper. Now, using this feature in a parent-child setup would result in ALL calls getting terminated by the parent gatekeeper after IRRFrequency because the child gatekeeper does not send IRR messages to the parent which makes the parent assume that the call has died. - Frank > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im > Auftrag von Frank Fischer > Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2005 13:08 > An: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: AW: Child-Parent scenario > > just fyi: there are some problems with q.931 signalling in > routed signaling mode in the 2.0.x branch (at least in 2.0.9 > and up). The source of these problems is the missing > end-to-end determination of capabilities during call setup. > This resultsin failing to setup a Q.931 channel if you have > different capability sets (and/or codes) on both sides of the > call. In such a case you wouldn't even be able to get an > ALERTING nor a CONNECT. > > -Frank > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im > Auftrag von > > Kamran Bukhari > > Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2005 12:49 > > An: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Betreff: Child-Parent scenario > > > > Hello > > > > After reading out the manual and also going through example file > > provided, I got confused in one thing... There is mention of E164 > > ...is this mandatory? if i donot provide this, then can i have the > > Parent-Child gatekeeper relationship? > > > > I am using version 2.0.8 of gatekeeper > > > > -- > > Kamran Bukhari > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > > Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing > Projects & Teams > > * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 > > Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & > EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development > Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * > Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process > Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________________ > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 > Unsubscribe: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
